Comments for Affection Code http://affectioncode.wordpress.com Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:35:25 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 Comment on Another comparison of HAProxy and Nginx by ryan http://affectioncode.wordpress.com/2008/06/28/another-comparison-of-haproxy-and-nginx/#comment-43 ryan Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:35:25 +0000 http://affectioncode.wordpress.com/?p=29#comment-43 see http://four.livejournal.com/955976.html for another comparison of haproxy and nginx. see http://four.livejournal.com/955976.html for another comparison of haproxy and nginx.

]]> Comment on Comparing Nginx and HAProxy for web applications by Alexander http://affectioncode.wordpress.com/2008/06/11/comparing-nginx-and-haproxy-for-web-applications/#comment-42 Alexander Sun, 04 Jan 2009 00:33:57 +0000 http://affectioncode.wordpress.com/?p=3#comment-42 The server is temporarily down, sorry. Will be back up on Monday. The server is temporarily down, sorry. Will be back up on Monday.

]]> Comment on Comparing Nginx and HAProxy for web applications by ktulhu http://affectioncode.wordpress.com/2008/06/11/comparing-nginx-and-haproxy-for-web-applications/#comment-41 ktulhu Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:15:42 +0000 http://affectioncode.wordpress.com/?p=3#comment-41 Link to the raw data here is broken :( Link to the raw data here is broken :(

]]> Comment on Comparing Nginx and HAProxy for web applications by wan optimization http://affectioncode.wordpress.com/2008/06/11/comparing-nginx-and-haproxy-for-web-applications/#comment-36 wan optimization Sun, 30 Nov 2008 09:15:09 +0000 http://affectioncode.wordpress.com/?p=3#comment-36 I've found that in our network WAN accelerators have made a big difference I’ve found that in our network WAN accelerators have made a big difference

]]> Comment on Another comparison of HAProxy and Nginx by José Antonio http://affectioncode.wordpress.com/2008/06/28/another-comparison-of-haproxy-and-nginx/#comment-35 José Antonio Sat, 15 Nov 2008 11:39:34 +0000 http://affectioncode.wordpress.com/?p=29#comment-35 "Can HAProxy serve static files though without involving Mongrel?" -No. but you can configure an ACL filter and move all static request to another server (i.e. ligthttpd, apache, nginx) # Static content acl url_static path_beg /javascripts /stylesheets /images acl url_static path_end .jpg .jpeg .gif .png .ico .pdf .js .css .flv .swf acl host_static hdr_beg(host) -i static0. static1. static2. static3. use_backend static if host_static or url_static # Default to dynamic content default_backend dynamic “Can HAProxy serve static files though without involving Mongrel?”

-No. but you can configure an ACL filter and move all static request to another server (i.e. ligthttpd, apache, nginx)

# Static content
acl url_static path_beg /javascripts /stylesheets /images
acl url_static path_end .jpg .jpeg .gif .png .ico .pdf .js .css .flv .swf
acl host_static hdr_beg(host) -i static0. static1. static2. static3.

use_backend static if host_static or url_static

# Default to dynamic content
default_backend dynamic

]]> Comment on Another comparison of HAProxy and Nginx by Alexander http://affectioncode.wordpress.com/2008/06/28/another-comparison-of-haproxy-and-nginx/#comment-34 Alexander Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:44:17 +0000 http://affectioncode.wordpress.com/?p=29#comment-34 No. HAProxy is a pure load balancer — it doesn't know how to map URLs to files. You need a web server such as Nginx or Lighttpd. (I wouldn't use Mongrel.) No. HAProxy is a pure load balancer — it doesn’t know how to map URLs to files. You need a web server such as Nginx or Lighttpd. (I wouldn’t use Mongrel.)

]]> Comment on Another comparison of HAProxy and Nginx by Tommy Tiddlekins http://affectioncode.wordpress.com/2008/06/28/another-comparison-of-haproxy-and-nginx/#comment-33 Tommy Tiddlekins Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:03:13 +0000 http://affectioncode.wordpress.com/?p=29#comment-33 Can HAProxy serve static files though without involving Mongrel? Can HAProxy serve static files though without involving Mongrel?

]]> Comment on The state of browser-based HTML editors by Joshua Peek http://affectioncode.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/are-html-editors-designed-by-idiots/#comment-32 Joshua Peek Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:05:16 +0000 http://affectioncode.wordpress.com/?p=28#comment-32 You may want to checkout http://github.com/josh/wysihat/ You may want to checkout http://github.com/josh/wysihat/

]]> Comment on Another comparison of HAProxy and Nginx by daeltar http://affectioncode.wordpress.com/2008/06/28/another-comparison-of-haproxy-and-nginx/#comment-31 daeltar Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:30:20 +0000 http://affectioncode.wordpress.com/?p=29#comment-31 @Alexander - sorry - I have read it in previous article after this one. @Alexander – sorry – I have read it in previous article after this one.

]]> Comment on Another comparison of HAProxy and Nginx by Alexander http://affectioncode.wordpress.com/2008/06/28/another-comparison-of-haproxy-and-nginx/#comment-30 Alexander Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:48:39 +0000 http://affectioncode.wordpress.com/?p=29#comment-30 @Morten: So serve them with Nginx and proxy back into HAProxy. @daeltar: This comparison <i>is</i> with the fair proxy module. @Morten: So serve them with Nginx and proxy back into HAProxy.

@daeltar: This comparison is with the fair proxy module.

]]>